The desire to simplify one's life occurs to most people about once or twice a year -- at the end and/or beginning of the year. Just about now, I've been thinking about rounding up clothes and things to take to Goodwill. I remember landing in the United States some thirty years ago with two suitcases in my hands which held the totality of my belongings; now it takes a semi-trailer truck to move all my and Kirk's stuff. I have always been attracted by the simple, self-sufficient way of life, in Thoreau's Walden. Here is a passage from the book about the 10 ft by 15 ft (150 S.F.) cabin he built for himself. Maybe that is not a realistic model for me, but someday I'd like to build a smallish house, no more than 1,000 S.F., and hope by then I will have whittled down my possessions to feel totally at home in it. Graham Hill probably can get some inspiration from Christopher Alexander's pattern #78, House for One Person and Frank Lloyd Wright's designs of Usonian Houses, a beautiful example of which is the 1,340 S.F. Jacob's House.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
"Life Edited"
Recently I came across a video called Less Stuff, More Happiness by Graham Hill, from one of the TED talks. Hill advocates for an edited life -- whittling the inessentials from one's life, living in smaller space with the aid of multi-functional design, reducing one's carbon footprint, etc. He conducted a competition to design a 420 S.F. apartment in New York City to house his choice possessions. Though one can be cynical, as many commentators were, about Hill's design desiderata -- his possessions which, though few, are an array of embarrassment of riches, I'm intrigued by the idea of editing one's life. The verb, edit, brings to mind the arduous process of refining a piece of writing by repeatedly paring down the superfluous material until it expresses the author's intention in the most succinct fashion possible, if one considers succinctness and brevity a virtue. As who you are is partly expressed by the stuff you own, it stands to reason that one needs to be selective and mindful about acquiring and accumulating personal effects; also, by not owing a lot of stuff, one avoids encumbering those who have to sort through one's stuff after one dies, which no doubt is an unpleasant thought.
The desire to simplify one's life occurs to most people about once or twice a year -- at the end and/or beginning of the year. Just about now, I've been thinking about rounding up clothes and things to take to Goodwill. I remember landing in the United States some thirty years ago with two suitcases in my hands which held the totality of my belongings; now it takes a semi-trailer truck to move all my and Kirk's stuff. I have always been attracted by the simple, self-sufficient way of life, in Thoreau's Walden. Here is a passage from the book about the 10 ft by 15 ft (150 S.F.) cabin he built for himself. Maybe that is not a realistic model for me, but someday I'd like to build a smallish house, no more than 1,000 S.F., and hope by then I will have whittled down my possessions to feel totally at home in it. Graham Hill probably can get some inspiration from Christopher Alexander's pattern #78, House for One Person and Frank Lloyd Wright's designs of Usonian Houses, a beautiful example of which is the 1,340 S.F. Jacob's House.
A commentator on Hill's talk posted a link to a video, called Stuff, of the comedian, George Carlin, talking about American's infatuation with stuff. It's hilarious.
The desire to simplify one's life occurs to most people about once or twice a year -- at the end and/or beginning of the year. Just about now, I've been thinking about rounding up clothes and things to take to Goodwill. I remember landing in the United States some thirty years ago with two suitcases in my hands which held the totality of my belongings; now it takes a semi-trailer truck to move all my and Kirk's stuff. I have always been attracted by the simple, self-sufficient way of life, in Thoreau's Walden. Here is a passage from the book about the 10 ft by 15 ft (150 S.F.) cabin he built for himself. Maybe that is not a realistic model for me, but someday I'd like to build a smallish house, no more than 1,000 S.F., and hope by then I will have whittled down my possessions to feel totally at home in it. Graham Hill probably can get some inspiration from Christopher Alexander's pattern #78, House for One Person and Frank Lloyd Wright's designs of Usonian Houses, a beautiful example of which is the 1,340 S.F. Jacob's House.
Labels:
Culture,
Everyday Life
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Tainan Madness
I'd like to share with you a video, which was taken by Kirk holding the camera with one hand while the other on the handle bar of a bicycle, of me riding a bicycle on the streets of Tainan on 12.30.2003. I did not know about it the whole time he was shooting the movie behind me on his bike. The movie has been edited several times by Greg, the guru of all things digital, with various musical accompaniments. Here is the version 3 of Tainan Madness -
Labels:
Travels
Tehachapi Loop
Tehachapi Loop |
***
First Snow of 2011 |
Labels:
Travels
Monday, November 28, 2011
Satyagraha
[Guest post by Greg]
While Judy and I do not catch the Met simulcast opera performances as often as SP, we were looking forward to seeing the Met's recent revival of their acclaimed 2008 production of Philip Glass' Satyagraha—whose subject is the larger-than-life figure of M.K. Ghandi.
The music of that opera—from the CBS recording—is a longstanding favorite of mine. It is beautiful and has an unusual emotional intensity that stands out independently of the language and any narrative associations. So I was really looking forward to seeing the production. I confess I enjoy a good deal of Philip Glass' music, so I was totally ready.
Judy was looking forward to it with some trepidation—thinking about what four hours of solid Glass might do to a person. She brought earplugs just in case we started going mad. (In truth, Judy and I have been to numerous live performances of Glass music over the years, and she always has enjoyed them and been impressed in spite of herself.)
And so to the Met's Satyagraha performance: Earplugs not needed! We both loved the show and were deeply impressed with the opera. Judy said afterward that Philip Glass had finally truly won her over, and when he took his bow at the end, she had felt true respect for what he had accomplished.
Here is a rather passionate review of the the production (originally mounted in 2008). Well worth reading and it will give you some idea of what the opera is all about—in lieu of going:
NYRB review of the show
It explains a lot about the idea of the opera and how it works—useful given its non-traditional nature. It is also a super-glowing review—which is rather lovely, because, in the end, I think what the reviewer most wanted to do was communicate enough of the ideas and the experience so that when he tells you he burst into tears at the end, you will understand him. Personally, I cried three and a half times, but maybe I don't count because I cry for everything—I cried twice when we went to see the Broadway musical, Wicked. But it wasn't just me this time. I am authorized to tell you that Judy also cried during the performance and teared up again later over dinner just talking about a certain moment of the piece. So that should tell you something. The opera operates on an emotional level with no traditional plot line—it picks up just enough pieces of narrative structure to touch on and build off of certain emotions. (Probably this makes it a sort of love it or hate it opera. We loved it.) It all makes some kind of brave wonderful sense, because Ghandi is such a big subject—to drop him into an opera plot would somehow smallerize him. Instead, by staying at some level of abstraction above simple storytelling, the opera manages to be a moving meditation on Ghandi's achievement and its lasting importance.
There were also some very imaginative and clever moments of stage design. Moody and compelling and exultant. Creative use of humble materials: newspaper, sticks, baskets, packing tape and set pieces that look like corregated iron. Some unusual larger-than-life puppets get into the act at various points in the show to mysterious effect.
The opera is sung in Sanskrit—which really seems the ideal language for Glass music. This means that no one hearing the opera understands what is being sung, but you know everything you need to know by the way the singers sing and their expressions and by knowing the setting. And in fact what they are singing is not directly related to the scenes they are enacting anyway—but are instead meditations from the Bhagavad Ghita. It is a genius, universalizing move for this opera and a nice challenge for the vocalists.
This is an enduring opera and likely to be the centerpiece of Glass' musical legacy—I would stake my operatic reputation on it. Far be it from me to recommend that you catch the encore broadcast (December 7th, 6:30pm), but you might want to check it out. You are well advised to read the scene synopses carefully, because you cannot reliably infer the biographical setting of the scenes from what you will see on stage.
"A masterpiece of musical and visual art." —New York Post
"Spectacular . . . [the music] frequently ravishing" —Associate Press
"A masterwork of theatrical intensity and integrity . . . Image after image is etched indelibly on the memory, in its masterly fusion of the aural and the visual." —The Times of London
"A thing of wonder . . . the whole thing serves as a monumental affirmation of human dignity at a time when many have begun to question its very existence-and for that, we must be infinitely grateful." —The Guardian
"Glass's theme is Gandhi and here -- arguably more than in any of his other stage works -- his style finds a soul-mate in the opera's central character. . . The result is an atmospheric, visually imaginative show." —The Financial Times
NY Times review (includes some visual-spoiler images and video).
The negative bits: There are two downsides both of which have to do with the broadcast of the opera, not the stage performance: 1) the between-acts host was not doing a great job (I don't know why the Met thinks it makes sense to give this job to opera singers -- because MCs and singers both vocalize? Really?) and 2) the Met camerawork was (again!) too busy and spends entirely too much time pulled in too close for a stage production—it is a problem not unique to this simulcast, but shows up more in this show because most of the action on stage is in the service of building an overall impression or making a scenic tableaux. It seemed clear that no one thought to tell the camera people that this is not a business-as-usual opera and to frame some idea for them about how they should approach it. (But see UPDATE below.)
UPDATE: J and I went to the encore performance and are convinced the footage had been edited in various places. This notably improved the camera work problem I noted above -- alternate camera feeds replacing the badly chosen ones during the live broadcast.
While Judy and I do not catch the Met simulcast opera performances as often as SP, we were looking forward to seeing the Met's recent revival of their acclaimed 2008 production of Philip Glass' Satyagraha—whose subject is the larger-than-life figure of M.K. Ghandi.
The music of that opera—from the CBS recording—is a longstanding favorite of mine. It is beautiful and has an unusual emotional intensity that stands out independently of the language and any narrative associations. So I was really looking forward to seeing the production. I confess I enjoy a good deal of Philip Glass' music, so I was totally ready.
Judy was looking forward to it with some trepidation—thinking about what four hours of solid Glass might do to a person. She brought earplugs just in case we started going mad. (In truth, Judy and I have been to numerous live performances of Glass music over the years, and she always has enjoyed them and been impressed in spite of herself.)
And so to the Met's Satyagraha performance: Earplugs not needed! We both loved the show and were deeply impressed with the opera. Judy said afterward that Philip Glass had finally truly won her over, and when he took his bow at the end, she had felt true respect for what he had accomplished.
Here is a rather passionate review of the the production (originally mounted in 2008). Well worth reading and it will give you some idea of what the opera is all about—in lieu of going:
NYRB review of the show
It explains a lot about the idea of the opera and how it works—useful given its non-traditional nature. It is also a super-glowing review—which is rather lovely, because, in the end, I think what the reviewer most wanted to do was communicate enough of the ideas and the experience so that when he tells you he burst into tears at the end, you will understand him. Personally, I cried three and a half times, but maybe I don't count because I cry for everything—I cried twice when we went to see the Broadway musical, Wicked. But it wasn't just me this time. I am authorized to tell you that Judy also cried during the performance and teared up again later over dinner just talking about a certain moment of the piece. So that should tell you something. The opera operates on an emotional level with no traditional plot line—it picks up just enough pieces of narrative structure to touch on and build off of certain emotions. (Probably this makes it a sort of love it or hate it opera. We loved it.) It all makes some kind of brave wonderful sense, because Ghandi is such a big subject—to drop him into an opera plot would somehow smallerize him. Instead, by staying at some level of abstraction above simple storytelling, the opera manages to be a moving meditation on Ghandi's achievement and its lasting importance.
There were also some very imaginative and clever moments of stage design. Moody and compelling and exultant. Creative use of humble materials: newspaper, sticks, baskets, packing tape and set pieces that look like corregated iron. Some unusual larger-than-life puppets get into the act at various points in the show to mysterious effect.
The opera is sung in Sanskrit—which really seems the ideal language for Glass music. This means that no one hearing the opera understands what is being sung, but you know everything you need to know by the way the singers sing and their expressions and by knowing the setting. And in fact what they are singing is not directly related to the scenes they are enacting anyway—but are instead meditations from the Bhagavad Ghita. It is a genius, universalizing move for this opera and a nice challenge for the vocalists.
This is an enduring opera and likely to be the centerpiece of Glass' musical legacy—I would stake my operatic reputation on it. Far be it from me to recommend that you catch the encore broadcast (December 7th, 6:30pm), but you might want to check it out. You are well advised to read the scene synopses carefully, because you cannot reliably infer the biographical setting of the scenes from what you will see on stage.
"A masterpiece of musical and visual art." —New York Post
"Spectacular . . . [the music] frequently ravishing" —Associate Press
"A masterwork of theatrical intensity and integrity . . . Image after image is etched indelibly on the memory, in its masterly fusion of the aural and the visual." —The Times of London
"A thing of wonder . . . the whole thing serves as a monumental affirmation of human dignity at a time when many have begun to question its very existence-and for that, we must be infinitely grateful." —The Guardian
"Glass's theme is Gandhi and here -- arguably more than in any of his other stage works -- his style finds a soul-mate in the opera's central character. . . The result is an atmospheric, visually imaginative show." —The Financial Times
NY Times review (includes some visual-spoiler images and video).
The negative bits: There are two downsides both of which have to do with the broadcast of the opera, not the stage performance: 1) the between-acts host was not doing a great job (I don't know why the Met thinks it makes sense to give this job to opera singers -- because MCs and singers both vocalize? Really?) and 2) the Met camerawork was (again!) too busy and spends entirely too much time pulled in too close for a stage production—it is a problem not unique to this simulcast, but shows up more in this show because most of the action on stage is in the service of building an overall impression or making a scenic tableaux. It seemed clear that no one thought to tell the camera people that this is not a business-as-usual opera and to frame some idea for them about how they should approach it. (But see UPDATE below.)
UPDATE: J and I went to the encore performance and are convinced the footage had been edited in various places. This notably improved the camera work problem I noted above -- alternate camera feeds replacing the badly chosen ones during the live broadcast.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
The Annual Elephant Parade
Either because I've become acclimatized or the warm weather is lingering longer this year, I've as yet not had any occasion to wear a long coat. In fact, it's quite common to see people in short-sleeves in the middle of the day. But despite the temperate weather, the general scenery around us is undoubtedly a wintry one. Most of the deciduous trees are already denuded of leaves, their grey and bare branches dangling and swaying in the wind like leftover Halloween skeletons.
We were informed by the City a couple of weeks ago that there would only be one curbside leaf pick-up for each residence this year, sometime between November 14 and December 30. Before long mounds of leaves began to pile up by the sides of the street in our neighborhood, to the extent that it became difficult to maneuver in and out of it in a car. Last weekend I reminded our yard service to schedule us for our annual leaf, roof, and gutter cleaning before the November 14 deadline. A team of men came yesterday equipped with blowers, rakes, tarps, and ladders and gave our yard a complete makeover; in a few hours all the leaves that had accumulated on the lawn, driveway, deck, planter boxes, roofs, etc. were miraculously lifted and deposited by the curb in front of the house. And to our pleasant surprise, on our way to the gym this morning we saw the leaf-vacuuming trucks already hard at work at the front of our neighborhood, several days ahead of schedule. I couldn't help wondering if somebody in our neighborhood has some special connection to the City Hall, for we seem always to get the most coveted city services before others. (For example, our street, for no apparent reason, got resurfaced this spring.)
Here is a video of the ponderous elephants on parade (or the leaf-vacuuming trucks in action) at the front of the house this morning.
We were informed by the City a couple of weeks ago that there would only be one curbside leaf pick-up for each residence this year, sometime between November 14 and December 30. Before long mounds of leaves began to pile up by the sides of the street in our neighborhood, to the extent that it became difficult to maneuver in and out of it in a car. Last weekend I reminded our yard service to schedule us for our annual leaf, roof, and gutter cleaning before the November 14 deadline. A team of men came yesterday equipped with blowers, rakes, tarps, and ladders and gave our yard a complete makeover; in a few hours all the leaves that had accumulated on the lawn, driveway, deck, planter boxes, roofs, etc. were miraculously lifted and deposited by the curb in front of the house. And to our pleasant surprise, on our way to the gym this morning we saw the leaf-vacuuming trucks already hard at work at the front of our neighborhood, several days ahead of schedule. I couldn't help wondering if somebody in our neighborhood has some special connection to the City Hall, for we seem always to get the most coveted city services before others. (For example, our street, for no apparent reason, got resurfaced this spring.)
Here is a video of the ponderous elephants on parade (or the leaf-vacuuming trucks in action) at the front of the house this morning.
Labels:
Bloomington,
Seasons
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Birds and Bees
Meyer Lemon Tree |
Apollo and Daphne |
As I've never cultivated a fruit tree indoors before, Rega advised that I would need to take on the work of birds and bees outdoors and perform, so to speak, artificial insemination on the tree, i.e., assist in its self-pollination, so that it could bear fruit indoors. How fascinating! I was a little daunted by the delicate operation but with the help of on-line instructions, some Q-tips, and a magnifying glass at hand, I was ready for the task. I look forward to harvesting plenty of lemons next spring.
Labels:
Gardening
Glorious Time of the Year
10.22.2011 |
08.17.2011 |
White River |
While rambling along one of the trails we came upon the bank of a sizable body of water, which turns out to be the western branch of the White River which runs through central and southern Indiana. Though land bound, Indiana is not entirely cut off from water after all. In addition to hiking and camping, they also offer guided horseback riding in the park. I can't wait to give it a try next spring.
Hikers |
Labels:
Bloomington,
Seasons
Saturday, October 15, 2011
Bragging Rights
No Sweat |
+10 years post race |
Labels:
Recreation
Friday, October 14, 2011
Remains of the Day
Daily Incense |
Labels:
Everyday Life
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
E-House
Recently I started thumbing through Christopher Alexander's "A Pattern Language" again after letting it languish on my bookshelf for some time. This monumental book on architecture, building, and planning was first published in 1977 and remains one of the best selling books in architecture (ranked #19 in Amazon's books in architecture,) though perhaps not so much for current architectural students and professionals. (It was never once mentioned in my graduate career in architecture at UF and was not heard of by my cohorts in the studios, who admittedly were 20 to 30 years my junior at the time.) I no longer remember how I came across the book but I remember purchasing it from Cody's in Berkeley; it must have been at least 25 years ago. The book had a profound influence on my becoming an architect, though the event seems to have taken place haphazardly.
The book is like a manual which gives ordinary people a systematic guide to thinking about a building project from the most abstract level to the most minute details. The "languages" of the book range from the macro scale of region, town, community, neighborhood, down to the micro scale of individual buildings and rooms, and a considerable portion of it deals specifically with dwellings. To my unsophisticated eye at the time, it was the last which attracted me the most. I don't know how many house plans I drew up before I ever contemplated the possibility of studying architecture. It is said that it's every architect's dream to have built a house for himself or herself that incorporates all the wisdom she has accumulated and the ideals she perhaps has forgotten or given up on. I have long ago abandoned the thought of ever building a "dream" house for my own, not so much because of financial reality but just in the recognition that "dreams" are essentially unrealizable.
However, it has never stopped me from thinking about it and doing it over and over again. This post is to show you my latest attempt in designing a house for Kirk and I. I called it "E-House" because its shape resembles an extended letter "E", a long, thin bar on one side with three short bars (wings) extending from it, separated by two voids (open courtyards.) This is my favorite house design as of now and I wouldn't mind building it and living in it, whether it ascends to the realm of the ideal or the dream is of no importance.
Here are some rendered images and computer-generated walk-through videos. For more information, please see the E-House page on my website.
The book is like a manual which gives ordinary people a systematic guide to thinking about a building project from the most abstract level to the most minute details. The "languages" of the book range from the macro scale of region, town, community, neighborhood, down to the micro scale of individual buildings and rooms, and a considerable portion of it deals specifically with dwellings. To my unsophisticated eye at the time, it was the last which attracted me the most. I don't know how many house plans I drew up before I ever contemplated the possibility of studying architecture. It is said that it's every architect's dream to have built a house for himself or herself that incorporates all the wisdom she has accumulated and the ideals she perhaps has forgotten or given up on. I have long ago abandoned the thought of ever building a "dream" house for my own, not so much because of financial reality but just in the recognition that "dreams" are essentially unrealizable.
However, it has never stopped me from thinking about it and doing it over and over again. This post is to show you my latest attempt in designing a house for Kirk and I. I called it "E-House" because its shape resembles an extended letter "E", a long, thin bar on one side with three short bars (wings) extending from it, separated by two voids (open courtyards.) This is my favorite house design as of now and I wouldn't mind building it and living in it, whether it ascends to the realm of the ideal or the dream is of no importance.
Here are some rendered images and computer-generated walk-through videos. For more information, please see the E-House page on my website.
Labels:
House Designs
Friday, September 16, 2011
Fall is here
unmistakable sign of fall |
10.6.2011 update:
Faded, dry, brittle leaves, falling like snow flakes, have steadily accumulated on all horizontal surfaces outdoors; roads, driveways, lawns, and roofs look like confetti-strewn floors at the close of political conventions.
Labels:
Seasons,
Wisteria House
Monday, September 12, 2011
Ludwig's 2011 B.O.Y. Party
2011 Party Flyer |
Flank Steak Recipe |
Although the format (pot luck), the basic ingredients (wine, grilled flank steak and chicken), and the participants (professional philosophers, future philosophers, and their spouses or significant others) of the party, down to the party flyer (with minor tweaks) have stayed the same through the years, the dynamic of the party seems to be different every year. There are certain factors which contribute to the changing dynamics from year to year - graduate students came and went (or not) and some faculty retired or moved away and new ones arrived, etc. But with our move to Bloomington, we've entered a totally new phase of the famous Ludwig's B.O.Y. party. The most notable differences about our last two parties from all the previous ones were, of course, the change of milieu--both the macro and micro environments were vastly different, and the missing of some familiar faces, without which the parties could never be the same.
As we had been living in small houses all these years in Gainesville, we noticed that people at our parties, which routinely numbered 30 and up, tended to crowd around the food table, elbow to elbow like in a packed subway car. My various efforts to entice people to move to other rooms in the house or venture outdoors had met with little success--people like to congregate where the action is and don't like to go where they feel isolated. Now, in our Bloomington house, the flow of party traffic is much improved and the size of the party has grown substantially to 50+, not only because the house is considerably larger than all our previous abodes but also because it is laid out in such a way that makes it an ideal party house. The entire back portion of the house, including the kitchen, breakfast area, TV room and Sunroom, is open to a generous deck which steps down to a terrace and the wisteria pergola, amidst a nicely landscaped garden. There are built-in benches on the deck and seating on the terrace and under the wisteria pergola. I set out the food, drink, and desert in different rooms which open to one another in the back of the house; people moved from room to room to get the various edibles, stopped to chat along the way, and then stepped outside to find a place to sit down to eat and talk. Small groups were formed here and there; philosophers and non-philosophers co-mingled, profs and students shared a lighthearted moment, and the first-year grads gotten over their diffidence. As for the macro environment, the early fall weather in Bloomington is mild and pleasant, perfect for sitting outdoors in the evening.
Though a private person by preference, I've acted the role of the hostess beside Kirk all these years with more or less alacrity and success. There is a certain amount of vulnerability involved in opening up one's house to a large group of people, most of whom one has never met before. I sometime felt like a stranger in my own house during these occasions. But I guess I appreciate Kirk's whole-hearted zeal toward community building, a genuine desire to make the working environment in the department a more pleasant place to be for everybody involved. Let's hope that it will have a salutary effect here as well.
Labels:
IU,
Wisteria House
Sunday, August 28, 2011
Just around the corner
Perhaps the most misleading phrase one hears close to the end of a race is "Just around the corner!" from the well-wishers on either side of the course. Depending on how depleted one is at the time, it can either be exhilarating or dispiriting - either "Thank goodness, it's almost over!" or "OMG, I'll never get there!" We are now four weeks into our 10-week half marathon training for the Indianapolis Marathon on October 15. It seems that one can't claim to know a place unless one ploughs through it on foot. I wouldn't have traversed all five boroughs in New York City if I hadn't run the NYC marathon there. I'm afraid the marathon days are over for us now, but being able to tough through some more "halfs" is still something for us to aspire to.
Whether you are ready for it or not, "things" in general seem about to turn a corner--a new semester officially starts tomorrow at IU, the annual football fever is about to heat up, and though the temperature is still hovering around low 80's, one is beginning to sense a reprieve from the oppressive heat and detect a hint of a change of color at the top of the trees. Kirk was seized with an inspiration yesterday to explore some nature areas around Bloomington. We hit the road and drove to McCormick's Creek State Park, about a 30-minute ride northwest of town. We drove past corn fields, barns, silos, and the quintessential deserted old main streets of small towns USA, in this instance, in Ellettsville and Spencer. Driving or walking on a part of the earth surface which we've not been before never fails to amaze me; to think that so many lives have, unbeknownst to us, existed and toiled in these parts for so long is something to wonder at. McCormick's Creek State Park, we learned, was dedicated in 1916 as Indiana's First State Park. We had a very pleasant walk on one of the trails under the dappled sunlight on the forest floor and we made a date to come back in late October to witness the leaves change colors.
I imagine that by this time my friends in Gainesville are chomping at the bit for the football season to start, no?
Dappled Light |
the Fall |
I imagine that by this time my friends in Gainesville are chomping at the bit for the football season to start, no?
Labels:
Bloomington,
Recreation,
Seasons
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Abby
Free-spirited Abby |
Tuesday, August 9, 2011
B-Line Trail
B-Line Trail |
Labels:
Bloomington,
Recreation
Saturday, August 6, 2011
Rocky Raccoon
Rocky Raccoon |
Labels:
Wisteria House
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Asymmetry
To demonstrate the differences, I used Photoshop to flip a picture of myself, Kirk, and President Obama horizontally. For me it is easy to tell the differences for there is a noticeable asymmetry in my face--there is a large mole under my left eye while there is none under my right eye. (But unlike the people in the story, I change my hair-part almost daily, so that is not a reliable predictor of whether it is the I you see or the one I see. Also, it disproves the theory of one of the interviewers in the story - my popularity, generally subdued, does not appreciatively increase or decrease depending on which side my hair is parted.)
How you see me |
How I see myself |
Labels:
Culture
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Small World
Kirk having a cappuccino |
at Small World Coffee |
Another venerable Princeton "institution" is Small World Coffee on Witherspoon Street, half a block across from the main gates of Princeton University. Many PU alumni cherish fond memories of countless hours spent there, though its reputation in the annals of Princeton lore is only half as old as that of PJ's. Despite the ever-expanding presence of Starbucks all over the country to, as it were, monopolize American's love affair with specialty coffee drinks, similar Indie-style coffee houses have been cropping up around college towns--places like Volta in Gainesville, Pourhouse and Runcible Spoon in Bloomington. From the point of view of a self-styled coffee aficionado, I'm afraid I'd have to give Volta a slight edge over Small World, though some of my readers may not agree with me. However, there is an unfortunate downside to Volta - it is not only that it's not within walking distance from UF campus, but that it's located inside a downtown parking garage, though for some people, the last may constitute a part of its charm.
In addition to hosting research seminars and workshops, Princeton University during the summer months is also a popular destination for summer camps, mostly sports-related, and international tourism, mostly from Asia. Bus-loads of tourists, from China, Korea, and Taiwan, are dropped off on Nassau Street every morning. The phenomenon can probably be explained by the fact that there is a kind of long-held mystique, a result of their worship of over-achievement (remembering Tiger Mothers), in the minds of Asian people about the Ivy League Schools in the U.S. and Princeton University, with its "monkey imitation of Cambridge," as uncharitably characterized by Bertrand Russell, is probably billed as the epitome of the Ivy League school.
And, troupes of kids in gear for such East-coast, "elitist" sports as field hockey and lacrosse, as contrasted with football and basketball in SEC schools, are also common sights on Princeton campus, as well as groups of prospective students and their parents shopping for the best ROI (return on investment) college. It has always puzzled me to hear that young people and their parents shop around the country for specific kinds of "college experience" when deciding which university to attend--witness the stories on the various college ranking categories on Huffington Post - the top 10 Hipster, Friendliest, Nerdiest, Trendiest Colleges, etc. (By the way, Princeton University, whose graduates enjoy the highest mid-career earnings with an average salary of $130,000.00, ranks number one among the "best-paying colleges" in the country.) In contrast, in most Asian countries, there is no "shopping" involved: the college one gets into is determined by one's test scores from the National College Entrance Examination held once a year; the same is true for the High School one attends.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Hogwarts Express
Princeton Station |
Joy catching the Dinky |
Speaking about trains, our experience riding the commuter trains to New York and back for the first time deserves a brief mention here. On our trip up there, upon sitting down in the crowded car where everybody seemed to be wrapped up in his or her own private world accessible only through ear-buds, we heard a couple of loud, angry, New York style, shouts of "Q U I E T !!! THIS IS A QUIET CAR!" directed to an innocent-looking guy saying goodbye to someone on the phone. We looked at one another, were glad that we didn't commit the faux pas of opening our mouths inadvertently, and rapidly scanned the car to locate a sign which might identify it as being a "Quiet Car." To our complete mystification, we could not find any. I figure that keeping one's mouth shut on a long commuter train ride is probably the best policy, especially during the morning commutes to work when almost everybody is, understandably, in a bad mood.
We were also confronted with a series of mysteries on our return journey from Penn Station. After a frantic search to locate the NJT lines, we found ourselves in a hall with a series of closed, narrow, double doors, identified by what looked to be platform numbers above them and a couple of TV monitors which supposedly would inform one which platform to go to board one's train. There happened to be a group of foreign teenagers, apparently over-stimulated by a day's fun at the great metropolis, scattered on the floor in front of each pair of the doors, singing kumbaya and generally carrying on without regards to the world around them. To our dismay we found that platform information, as if with the intention of causing havoc, was withheld from passengers until a couple of minutes before boarding time. We parked ourselves in front of one of the doors, chosen at random, and I eyed the narrow double doors uncomfortably, anticipating the stampede to come when the platform information was announced. All of a sudden, a roar of "number 9 [3/4]" erupted from the group of kids, a mad dash toward a stairway somewhere ensued, away from the doors marked "9", leaving a few old folks like us standing in front of the number 9 door looking bewildered. These turned out to be doors to small elevators which would take one directly down to the designated platforms.
After boarding the train, it soon became apparent that there was no A/C at all and that nobody was observing the silence etiquette, perhaps because it was not a "Quiet Car" or that it was so late that nobody cared. At various stops along the way, the conductor repeatedly instructed the disembarking passengers to move to the very front of the train as only the door on the first train would open to allow passengers to get off. Why it had to be so was quite unaccountable. Later we learned from a conductor collecting tickets that we were in the only car in the mighty long train where the A/C was not working, but he said he would "reset it" when he "got a chance." It got intolerably hot instead, and we finally moved to a different car, a long way from where we were, to the front of the train. When we finally arrived at the Princeton Junction, thinking that we were well positioned to be near the doors which would likely open, we were told, as if by a sheer caprice, that all doors would open at that station. We ended up getting off at the far end of the platform and had to march a long distance to get off and on to another platform to catch the train back to Princeton.
P.S.: I wonder whether our next train experience will be less mysterious.
P.P.S.: I just went to the station to take a picture of the Dinky and was alarmed to find that it was out of service. Could it be that its demise is drawing near?